Tag Archives: Movie Reviews

American Sniper

308555id1i_TheJudge_FinalRated_27x40_1Sheet.indd

A little more Bradley Cooper, A little less everything else…..

Clint Eastwood returns to solid form with this tale of the real life exploits of Chris Kyle, a United States Navy SEAL who was awarded the dubious title of most lethal sniper in U.S. military history.

A stark, powerfully-acted drama featuring a career-best turn from Bradley Cooper.

The story is wafer-thin , not even worth getting into…. School essays on Kyle would have more depth. But this is all about the two men – one behind the camera and the other in front who are on top of their games…

Both the action scenes and the scenes at “home” are filmed with extraordinary spatial clarity – very much filmmaking 101

Its because of these two “heroes” that despite its missteps, American Sniper is still a powerful, deftly pulled-off film which works more as a competent character study of a single-minded man, and less as a lesson on war and its aftermath.

In conclusion, if a ticket at a multiplex costs Rs.300 this movie is worth every penny if you treat it as a movie and not some deeper meditation on war….

SAUMIL BHANSHALI

ZERO DARK THIRTY

ZERO DARK THIRTY

ZDT is more of a chronicler of events leading to (Beware – Spoiler Ahead !!!!!!!) the death of Osama Bin Laden. While the final picture is always known to the audience, the fun lies in how the jigsaw pieces come together over the 2hour 37minute runtime to form the final picture. If you’re in the mood for brainless twists and illogical turns watch an Abbas-Mustan flick instead.

There is absolutely nothing new in the plot, nothing that the papers haven’t regurgitated over and over again. Right from the inhumane torture methods employed to the final violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, everything has been documented.

What’s new though is the ref
reshing treatment given to the docu-drama by Kathryn Bigelow, the first woman to have won Oscars for both Best Picture and Best Director for Hurt Locker. This time round though, its difficult for this Mark Boal written and produced film to get Best Picture since there is little by way of suspense. Infact compared to Argo, it appears substantially less entertaining as well. (And we know the 3 things that sell movies in India – Entertainment, entertainment and entertainment – courtesy The Dirty Picture). Few actually refer to this as Anti-Pop !!!!

Make no mistake though, I highly recommend this movie, for all cinephiles and especially budding directors for it’s a crash course in how detailing and painstaking research can elevate the material, keeping the audience interested even though they know what’s happening next.

This is a singular film. We see what is happening, and we’re allowed to have our own thoughts about it, and to carry them with us out of the theatre. It’s a movie that follows you home. It makes an impact with hardly any preaching. Very, very subtly the point is made that torture almost always resulted in wrong information. Bribery (a Lamborghini, no less !!!) has better results, but there is no substitute for hours spent poring over files and re-going over the details…. That’s where the real intelligence is gathered from.

Starting off with a black screen and 9/11 recordings perfectly sets the stakes for the decade long hunt. Quickly moving from CIA Black Sites around the world to Pakistan to Afghanistan to Washington and culminating in the Abbotabad raid at zero dark thirty (military speak for 12.30 AM), the movie unfolds like a razor blade – sharp and direct. No unwanted side plots or indulgent scenes here. No ideology or politics here. Only honesty. Just the facts which inevitably pulls the audience into ambiguous moral territory.
No decent human could fully agree with the American methods to counter terrorism, but there is no sugarcoating here. The movie has presented the terrorists and the search for them as it is in real life – cruel, controversial, cold blooded, corrupt and almost cannibalistic (in the sense that human lives have little value in this war on terror)….. There are many scenes where the line between those carrying out terrorism and those attempting to refute it grows increasingly tricky to discern.

The last 40 minutes are right on riveting. You’ll forget you are in a movie theater once the helicopters take off, instead you will be riding shotgun on one of the most famous missions in history. Bigelow does not resort to romanticism or flag- waving sensationalism to make the finale more palatable.

The protagonist Maya is a uni-dimensional character with no apparent family and no real friends. Jessica Chastain’s portrayal of the obsessive CIA analyst deserves an Oscar and she will get it.

In conclusion, if a ticket at a multiplex costs Rs. 300, this movie is worth the money. Watch it, if only for the history lesson…….Like Michael Crichton has eloquently put “If you don’t know history, then you don’t know anything. You are a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree. ”

SAUMIL BHANSHALI

LIFE OF PI

LIFE OF PI – WORTH LIVING THROUGH !!!!

Don’t wait for the DVD unless you have a 21 by 9 Metres Television set with inbuilt 3D !!!!!

Forget the story watch it for the incredible indelible impactful imprint left on your eyes during its 127 minute duration.

Ang Lee(Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon) is a sorcerer, for the book on which this movie is based on was supposed to be “unfilmable”. Life of Pi is a fantasy adventure novel by Yann Martel published in 2001. The protagonist, Piscine Molitor “Pi” Patel, an Indian boy from Pondicherry, explores issues of spirituality and practicality from an early age. He survives 227 days after a shipwreck while stranded on a boat in the Pacific Ocean with a Bengal tiger, weirdly named Richard Parker. Allegorically the movie adaptation too has taken many days to see the light of day. (2005 was when M.Night Shyamalan was approached to direct it !!)

Comparisons could be made to other single actor survivor silver screen shows like 127 Hours or Castaway. While these two do have emotionally richer and more accessible screenplays they don’t even come close to the transcendent sublime imagery shown in this movie. Truly Ang Lee has redefined “cool” with the effects and CGI on display.

Adapted for the screen by David Magee, the movie is framed as an extended conversation between a frustrated novelist (Rafe Spall) and the title character (played by Irrfan Khan in the framing device) — who shortened his original name Piscine (French for “swimming pool”) to avoid the taunts of his schoolmates — the narrative begins with Pi’s early years in Pondicherry, India, where his father ran the local zoo. The first act of “Life of Pi” shows him always fascinated with aspects of various religions, choosing parts of each in which to believe. Soon however a teenaged Pi (Suraj Sharma) is faced with a Titanic-like disaster and finds himself in a predicament now well known to anyone who has seen the trailers or even the posters….

Stuck on a lifeboat with a most unreliable coterie of critters, Pi’s odyssey defines the word spectacular. The second act is littered with lush imagery and richly detailed seascapes. If these scenes could be paused and framed and auctioned in Sotheby’s, I’m sure they would make enough money to fund the movie’s $70 million budget !!!!

And so onto the third and perhaps the weakest of the acts. It does not lead to a crescendo of intellectual and spiritual elation, like the book. Just bringing up God and faith and presenting them with visual style is not enough. Say something about religion. Say something about God. “Life of Pi” thinks it’s a deep meditation about faith but it’s really not. The book is infinitely richer. Seems like the filmmakers were exhausted by the time the conclusion came around. If only the themes were as deeply thought out as the visuals, this would certainly be one of the Oscar favorites. But all’s forgiven because of the “eye-gasmic” feast we have gorged on for the major part of the movie.
Also , as Ang Lee spelt out in one of his interviews, sometimes like faith, the movie works better when we believe it in our souls rather than when its spelt out on screen before us. As TIME Magazine says, “Magical realism was rarely so magical and never before so real than when you see this movie”

Acting kudos to the CGI team for the best tiger since Sherkhan, and also to the 17 year old Suraj Sharma who in his debut puts in a cracker of a performance. Note how he loses weight and changes physically as his ordeal continues.

In conclusion, if a ticket at a multiplex costs Rs. 300, this movie is worth the entire price of admission to a cinema. It is definitely worth seeing and the viewer would do absolute injustice to oneself if its not seen on a 21 X 9 meter screen with 3D glasses.

— SAUMIL BHANSHALI

SKYFALL

SKYFALL Old dog, New Tricks !!!
Girls – The female lead is all of 77 years old ! A seasoned vintage indeed !!
Gadgets – A gun and a radio (nothing else not even an exploding pen)!!
Gas guzzlers – A throwback to the old days – a 1960 vintage Aston martin DB5 !!!
Yes, this Bond(Daniel Craig) is different. In the capable hands of Sam Mendes (American Beauty) he has been deconstructed and like he himself says, resurrected. After the 23rd installment spanning 50 years the audience can safely conclude that Britain’s national treasure is in safe hands.
Bond films are a genre unto themselves and any new entrant is always measured up against the previous ones. So not everything is different – Chart topping – title song? Check. Thrilling, thumping, talismanic, telekinetic opening sequence? Check. Exotic locales ? Double Check (Turkey and China) Scenery chewing psychopathic villain? Triple Check (Javier, Javier and Javier Bardem). Infact while casting for the role of the villain, Mendes had lobbied hard for Bardem to accept the part. In preparing for the role, Bardem had the script translated into his native Spanish in order to better-understand his character, which Mendes cited as being a sign of the actor’s commitment to the film.
Starting off with a subtle nod to the Wikileaks furore, cyber-terrorists have stolen a hard drive containing a complete list of NATO operatives embedded in secret operations all over the world. The trail leads Bond from the bazaars of Istanbul to the casinos of Macau, culminating in a fabulous confrontation with a flamboyant (for want of a better adjective) villain on a far out island !!
The brooding Bond is perfectly played by the craggy Craig with a rugged roughness, definitely shaken not stirred !! He almost dies before the opening credits come on, and a number of times thereafter. Embittered, battered, aged, shaken, stirred, shot and surprise, surprise with permanent stubble.
M, too is frostier and fighting harder for her survival than ever. She is under attack from without and under scrutiny from within. All the while the psychopath stays few steps ahead of them. So far, so dark, so bitter but so very, very good. A chest wound, shaky trigger fingers, advancing age may have slowed James down physically but this is a more intelligent Bond and infinitely more relatable.
A third act which emphasises more on character development rather than an action set-piece will no doubt come as a letdown to most movie-goers. And this represents the major flaw in the sense that it gives us an impression of less bang for our bucks.. The final script which was written by Bond screenwriting regulars Neal Purvis and Robert Wade finds it difficult to give the devil his deserved desserts.
Thanks to lensman Roger Deakins and production designer Dennis Gassner, the locales have never looked better be it a Shanghai skyscraper rippled by neon advertising or a Scottish highland home nestled amongst moors.
Of the cast, as you would have guessed Craig, Bardem and Dench are outstanding. Support cast in the form of Ralph Fiennes, as a Brit bureaucrat, Naomie Harris, as an MI6 agent, Ben Whishaw as Q and Berenice Marlowe as a sexy siren Severine are more than adequate. Only Albert Finney is wasted in a role which doesn’t really make any sense.
Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli have produced a triumphant re-boot of the spy series. Oh yes, the world’s favorite franchise is well and truly secure and will definitely win itself a whole new generation/legion of fans with Skyfall.
In conclusion, if a ticket at a multiplex costs Rs. 300, this movie is definitely worth every penny and would have been more had the climax been more conventional.

SAUMIL BHANSHALI

Friends With Benefits

FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS
As you can guess from the title and the posters it’s a rom-com. There’s even a rom-com within the rom-com, starring Jason Segel and Rashida Jones. The title conveys the premise too. Talk about subtlety. Understandably, The premise: Can two people have a successful ongoing sexual relationship without becoming lovers? Well of course they can’t, but this is the second movie this year (No Strings Attached was the other one) to pose the question. By now most of the core viewership targeted by the movie would know what to expect – the formulaic – meet, become friends, have sex, fall in love, meet obstacles, break up etc etc. In fact apart from the sex part it could easily pass off as any one of numerous bollywood rom coms too.
But I still enjoyed it thoroughly and I suspect so will most of the audiences. The main reason is the “Friends” which greatly benefit the wafer thin storyline. Megastars Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis infuse sparkle, energy and humour in their performances making you smile and want to fall in love. The onscreen chemistry they share (whether they are chatting or making love) burns through the screen. Both are likable actors, the banter between them is enjoyable and most importantly they look nice dressed and undressed. Hard to believe that they’re not a real-life couple.
Another plus is Will Gluck’s (Easy A) direction. It’s a believably engaging effort highlighting the stars’ charming performances. Through the first 2/3rds the movie excels at identifying and then deconstructing the clichés of the romantic comedy. Finally however it paints itself into a thematic corner by trying to bend the rules and follow the formula. But then like I said earlier the audience knows what its expecting and the expectations are fulfilled.
The movie is also bolstered by resonant supporting performances. Richard Jenkins (“The Visitor”) portrays Dylan’s father, whose shrewdness is fighting a losing battle against his Alzheimer’s. Patricia Clarkson (“Shutter Island”) enjoys some of the best lines as Jamie’s flighty mom. And Woody Harrelson brings hilarity to the role of Dylan’s co-worker, GQ’s candidly gay sports editor. GQ art editor = straight, GQ sports editor = gay. Another example of how clichés are reworked in the film.
The final highlight is the dialogue delivered quickly by the cast and filled with great punchlines and a crisp contemporary vibe.
So, no plot description here. There’s no need. No need for character names either. Suffice to say that the non-couple couple spends time in New York City for a while, then they go to Los Angeles, then back to New York.
If a ticket at the multiplex costs Rs. 300, this movie is worth at least Rs. 600. @200 for the dialogues, @200 for Mila Kunis and @200 for Justin Timberlake (and note that either Mila or Justin are present in almost every single frame of the movie.)